Campaign for Liberty has joined a coalition against the Postal Service Reform Act (H.R. 5714), legislation introduced by House Government and Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz.
Under the guise of postal "reform" this legislation would make it easier for the Post Office to, among other things, increase postage prices (because when your business is losing customers the best thing to do is to raise prices).
Instead of driving customers away with higher prices, Congress should repeal the Post Office's monopoly on first-class mail, repeal other special privileges granted the Post Office, and allow the Post Office to compete fairly with other providers in a free-market.
In the age of e-mail, where we can talk to and send pictures to our family and friends, as well as pay bills on our phones, their is no justification for the federal government to grant one institution a monopoly on first-class mail (which is not to imply that the Post Office's monopoly was ever justified.)
Here is some more information on postal privatization courtesy of the Cato Institute.
Campaign for Liberty members who support free-market mail delivery should call their Representatives and Senators and tell them to oppose HR 5714 and support privatizing the Post Office.
Here is the coalition letter opposing HR 5714:
To Members of the U.S. Congress:
We, the undersigned organizations, representing millions of taxpayers and consumers nationwide, urge Congress to oppose H.R. 5714, the “Postal Service Reform Act of 2016” introduced by House Government Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, and the Committee’s Ranking Member Elijah Cummings.
For years, the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) has suffered from operational and financial inefficiencies, and while reforms are needed, H.R. 5714 misses the mark and may actually exacerbate the issues facing USPS.
The USPS enjoys a monopoly on the delivery of first-class and standard mail and is exempt from state and local sales, income, and property taxes. The USPS also has the power of eminent domain, is not subject to local zoning ordinances, and has borrowed billions from the Treasury at subsidized interest rates.
Despite such special treatment, which is estimated to be $18 billion annually in indirect subsidies, USPS’s financial health is continually waning. Since 2007, USPS has posted more than $50 billion in losses and faces $125 billion in unfunded liabilities. Much of this stems from USPS’s inability to adapt to changing markets, congressional impediments, and union quagmires.
Many of the reforms provided for in H.R. 5714 lead USPS further away from the core mission of mail delivery, unfairly shift the Postal Service’s financial burdens onto the American public, and fail to address many of the underlying issues facing USPS.
Diversion to Nonpostal Products and Services. Key provisions contained in H.R. 5714 would allow the Postal Service to divert resources away from the core mission of mail delivery to providing nonpostal products and services to state, local, and tribal governments and federal agencies. The Act creates a “Chief Innovation Officer” tasked with managing the development and implementation of nonpostal products. While intended to generate new sources of revenue, such provisions are only a point of distraction, and will see the Postal Service further competing with private firms.
Postal Rate Reforms and Increases. Chairman Chaffetz’s reform bill would allow the Postal Service to increase rates by 2.15 percent on monopoly products such as stamps. Monopoly products generate the bulk of USPS profits. Increasing rates will only reduce revenue and further drive more consumers away from USPS products and services.
Postal Service Governance Reform. The USPS Board of Governors is comprised of nine members, not including the Postmaster General and Deputy Postmaster General, who are Presidentially appointed and confirmed by the Senate and serve seven-year terms. Since 2015, the Board of Governors has had only one Governor serving due to congressional hurdles. H.R. 5714 would reduce the USPS Board of Governors from a nine-member board to a five-member board. This hollow reform does nothing to actually improve USPS governance, and instead reinforces the fact that most of the provisions in the bill are simply reforms for the sake of reforms, having no real impact on the status quo.
We recognize the need for reforming the U.S. Postal Service. However Chairman Chaffetz’s Postal Service Reform Act ignores basic needed reforms to USPS, and instead increases rates, shifts USPS’s financial burden onto the American public, and allows for the diversion of resources away from the core mission of mail delivery.
It is for these reasons that we ask members of Congress to oppose this legislation.
Sincerely,
Grover G. Norquist
Americans for Tax ReformDavid Williams
Taxpayers Protection AllianceJim Martin
60 Plus AssociationPhil Kerpen
American CommitmentJohn M. Palatiello
Business Coalition for Fair CompetitionNorm Singleton
Campaign for LibertyAndrew F. Quinlan
Center for Freedom and ProsperityJeffrey L. Mazzella
Center for Individual FreedomTom Schatz
Council for Citizens Against Government WasteChuck Muth
Citizen OutreachKatie McAuliffe
Digital LibertyAdam Brandon
Freedom WorksGeorge C. Landrith
Frontiers of FreedomMario Lopez
Hispanic Leadership FundSabrina Schaeffer
Independent Women’s ForumAndrew Langer
Institute for LibertySeton Motley
Less GovernmentWilles K. Lee
National Federation of Republican AssembliesKevin Kosar
R Street InstituteKaren Kerrigan
Small Business & Entrepreneurship CouncilRyan Alexander
Taxpayers for Common SenseJudson Phillips
Tea Party Nation
Print 
PDFTags: Congress, Post Office