Campaing for Liberty joins efforts to limit spending

Campaign for Liberty has joined a coalition of 21 other groups in an open letter to the House and Senate demanding they not use budget gimmicks, like hiding additional military funding in Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) accounts, to increase spending above the budget caps. While adhering to the caps, instead of once again resorting to budget gimmicks would represent a small step forward, the Congress needs to cut spending in order to avoid economic calamity, and preserve our liberty. This is why Campaign for Liberty will continue to work for Real Cuts, Right Now in all areas of government.

Text of the letter below:

July 24, 2014

Open Letter to the House and Senate:

 Keep the Caps

We, the undersigned organizations, representing millions of Americans dedicated to fiscal responsibility, urge you to strictly abide by the discretionary budget caps originally established by the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA) and subsequently modified by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 or “Ryan-Murray,” as it is commonly known. In particular, our organizations and members are concerned about efforts to circumvent these spending restraints through the use of budgetary gimmicks. Many of us were disappointed by, and opposed to last year’s Ryan-Murray agreement that allowed for an additional $63 billion in discretionary spending for fiscal years (FY) 2014 and 2015—well over the amounts initially provided for by the BCA. Despite our concerns, some lawmakers supported the deal because its near-term spending increases were intended to be offset by longer-term deficit-reducing measures. Nevertheless, if Congress is to have any credibility on fiscal restraint, it should not further alter the caps and allow spending to exceed the already-revised discretionary figure of $1.014 trillion for FY015. Maintaining this level appears to be in jeopardy, which is cause for serious concern. In particular, we urge Members to be vigilant about the potential misuse of the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) account. These funds should be used exclusively for their intended purpose—not as a backdoor means to increase resources for the base defense budget or for other, unrelated spending items. As military operations in Afghanistan wind down, so too should OCO, as this off-budget account poses a threat to fiscal responsibility. Additionally, we are concerned about budgetary gimmicks often called “changes in mandatory programs” or CHIMPs. CHIMPs are sometimes used to shift spending outside the budget window on paper without actually saving taxpayers any money. Doing so should not be permitted because it would disingenuously hide spending and undermine budget caps. Again, we encourage you to exercise fiscal discipline, avoid CHIMPs or other budgetary gimmicks, and oppose any spending legislation that would violate the BCA or of the modest limits established in Ryan-Murray. Sincerely,

Brandon Arnold National Taxpayers Union

Norman Singleton Campaign for Liberty

James L. Martin 60 Plus Association

Phil Kerpen American Commitment

Grover Norquist Americans for Tax Reform   

Brian Garst Center for Freedom and Prosperity

Jonathan Bydlak Coalition to Reduce Spending

Lawson Bader Competitive Enterprise Institute

Peter J. Thomas The Conservative Caucus, Inc.

Mattie Duppler Cost of Government Center

Tom Schatz Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

Jim Babka DownsizeDC.org  

Coley Jackson Freedom Action                                                                              

Matt Kibbe FreedomWorks

Andrew Moylan R Street Institute

Matt Nye Republican Liberty Caucus

Dave Wallace Restore America’s Mission  

Paul Gessing Rio Grande Foundation  

Ryan Alexander Taxpayers for Common Sense

David Williams Taxpayers Protection Alliance

Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF

Tags: ,