The Senate voted to table Rand Paul's amendment to offset the cost of Hurricane Harvey relief by taking money from foreign aid accounts by a vote of 87-10. Only ten Senators would even vote to move forward to debate the amendment.
Following that vote, the Senate passed the Hurricane relief bill/continuing resolution/debt ceiling increase by a vote of 80-18.
The Senate bill doubles the amount of spending in the bill to $15.25 billion dollars.
The bill now goes to the House where it will be voted on either tomorrow or Saturday.
The House is working on the Omnibus appropriations bill and votes are expected to last throughout the night.
Among the amendments the House will vote on are three limiting the use of civil asset forfeiture (“theft”). The amendment is aimed at reversing Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s announcement that he would increase the use of civil asset theft.
Campaign for Liberty members should call their Representatives and tell them to vote for all amendments limiting civil asset theft.
Here is the text of a coalition letter Campaign for Liberty is signing in support of the anti-civil asset theft amendments:
September 7, 2017
Members of the U.S. House of Representatives United States Capitol
Washington, D.C. 20515
RE: Support for the Civil Forfeiture Amendments to H.R. 3354 YES on Walberg/Cohen #46
YES on Raskin/Sensenbrenner #67
YES on Amash/Sanford #70
Dear Members of Congress:
On behalf of the undersigned organizations dedicated to the protection of civil liberties and private property, we write to urge you to SUPPORT THE CIVIL FORFEITURE AMENDMENTS to H.R. 3354, the appropriations bill currently pending on the floor of the House of Representatives. Those amendments include Walberg/Cohen #46,
Raskin/Sensenbrenner #67, and Amash/Sanford #70. All three of these amendments should receive votes late tonight.
These civil forfeiture amendments have been offered on a bipartisan basis in order to prevent the unjustified expansion of civil forfeiture and to ensure that the protections for innocent property owners that were put in place in 2015 are restored and remain in place. These amendments do not abolish civil forfeiture completely—though many of our organizations would support such a change—but they do represent a positive step that will prevent the federal government from undermining state-level reform.
The current civil forfeiture system undermines property rights and is fundamentally unjust. Law enforcement can confiscate property from citizens and businesses without any criminal conviction or even criminal charges. Once their property has been seized, ordinary Americans must navigate a system that is stacked against them. For example, property owners must prove they are “not guilty,” turning the fundamental presumption of innocence on its head.
The Department of Justice recently announced that it would expand the use of civil forfeiture, reversing the ban on so-called “adoptive” seizures. These adoptive seizures allow state and local law enforcement to use federal forfeiture laws to circumvent state-law limitations, undermining the states and communities that you represent. This new policy is an affront to basic principles of federalism, and it should not be funded by American taxpayers.
Thank you for your attention, and thank you for voting YES on Walberg/Cohen #46, Raskin/Sensenbrenner #67, and Amash/Sanford #70.
The Institute for Justice
American Civil Liberties Union
Americans for Forfeiture Reform
Campaign for Liberty
The Daniel Project
Justice Action Network
The Libre Initiative
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
R Street Institute
American Conservative Union
Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Drug Policy Alliance
Americans for Prosperity
Concerned Veterans for America
The DKT Liberty Project
The Goldwater Institute
The Law Enforcement Action Partnership
Our America Initiative