Home » Members Posts » Pa. federal judge rules against insurance mandate–Lancaster County Lawyer Represents York Couple

Pa. federal judge rules against insurance mandate–Lancaster County Lawyer Represents York Couple

 

Pa. federal judge rules against insurance mandate–Lancaster County Lawyer Represents York Couple

Dear Readers, So, on which side will the black-robed gods come down on in regards to Obamacare? WTP (We The People) or PTB (powers that be)? Blessings, Dona Witmer

PS A Lancaster County Native argued this case before the PA Supreme Court:

Paul A. Rossi, a 1986 Lancaster Christian School graduate, successfully argued that the requirement in Obama's signature legislative accomplishment that individuals buy health insurance is unconstitutional. http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/458340_Local-lawyer-successfully-argues-case-against-health-care-law.html

 

MARC LEVY, Associated Press Sep. 13, 2011   http://hosted2.ap.org/PALAP/d3444c3add384b05a39deb3258f13309/Article_2011-09-13-Health%20Care%20Overhaul-Pennsylvania/id-42f31ff57b984cab99666a4edf1cfec9

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) – A federal judge in Pennsylvania has ruled that the requirement in President Barack Obama's health care overhaul that individuals buy health insurance is unconstitutional.

Judge Christopher Conner in Harrisburg issued the ruling Tuesday in one of more than 30 lawsuits nationwide that have been filed over the law. He says the individual mandate is an unconstitutional extension of authority granted to the federal government under the Constitution's commerce clause.

The suit was filed by a York County couple.

Separate lawsuits have already reached appeals courts in Richmond, Va., Georgia and Cincinnati, with two of those courts ruling in favor of the mandate. The matter is expected to be settled by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Conner was appointed to the federal bench in 2002 by President George W. Bush.


Subscribe

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.