This Week in Congress

The House is in session Monday through Thursday. The Senate is also in session Monday through Thursday. They will consider nominations.

On Tuesday the House will consider H.R. 3411. This bill amends the definition of “joint employer” to include only those who exercise significant control over the workforce. This change is necessary to protect businesses from being liable for labor violations by companies they are partnering with but had no control over.

Campaign for Liberty members should call their Representatives and tell them to support H.R. 3411.

Here is the text of a coalition letter Campaign for Liberty cosigned in support of this bill:

October 3, 2017

Dear Member of Congress:

The undersigned organizations write in strong support of legislation, the Save Local Business Act (H.R. 3441), sponsored by Rep. Bradley Byrne (R-Ala.). This bill would restore and harmonize National Labor Relations Act and Fair Labor Standards Act standards on when two or more businesses are deemed to be joint employers. Congressional action is urgent and necessary to fix a problem—caused by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)—that is negatively impacting countless small businesses and their employees nationwide.

Prior to August 2015, the standard used by the NLRB made it easy to understand who is and is not a joint employer. A joint employer relationship existed when one company exercised “direct and immediate” control over another company’s workforce. But under the NLRB’s new definition, as stated in the case Browning Ferris Industries, joint employer liability could be triggered by a company exercising vaguely defined indirect control or unexercised potential control. Even a code of corporate social responsibility for business partners could be found to establish joint employer status.

H.R. 3441 would reinstate the longstanding definition of what constitutes a joint employer. For decades, that standard and legal framework helped foster the creation of thousands of beneficial business relationships. It allowed entrepreneurs to launch franchise businesses and for contractors to thrive.

A policy that makes businesses liable for the practices of their contractors and will cause companies to make changes that leave people worse off, such as ending those relationships with smaller businesses. That means fewer job opportunities, fewer opportunities for entrepreneurs, and fewer chances for American businesses to grow and create jobs.

Employers that have contractual arrangements with franchisees and other small businesses could be forced to take greater control of their operations to mitigate the nearly unlimited liability to which the new joint employer standard could expose them. Many independent small businesspeople value the autonomy and flexibility of being their own boss. Many of these job creators have expressed fears about how they will lose autonomy that made them want to start a business.

Those fears are well founded. Research from the American Action Forum suggests failing to revert to the “direct and immediate” control standard could inflict devastating impact on the economy. They estimated that the NLRB’s new joint employer standard could result in 1.7 million fewer jobs.
Congress should restore the traditional joint employer standard that has served all stakeholders—workers, consumers, and employers—well for decades. Government policies should promote, not harm, innovation, flexible work arrangements, and entrepreneurship.

For these reasons, we urge you to vote Yes on Rep. Byrne’s H. R. 3441. Thank you for considering our views.

Iain Murray, Vice President for Strategy
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Phil Kerpen, President
American Commitment

Lisa B. Nelson, CEO
ALEC Action

Dee Stewart, President
Americans for a Balanced Budget

Rick Manning, President
Americans for Limited Government

Chrissy Harbin, Vice President of External Affairs
Americans for Prosperity

Grover Norquist, President
Americans for Tax Reform

Norman Singleton, President
Campaign for Liberty

Steven J. Allen, Vice President & Chief Investigative Officer
Capital Research Center

Steve Buckstein, Founder
Cascade Policy Institute

Timothy Lee, Senior Vice President for Legal and Public Affairs
Center for Individual Freedom

Ginvera Joyce Meyers,
Executive Director
Center for Innovation and Free Enterprise

Matt Patterson, Executive Director
Center for Worker Freedom

Andrew F. Quinlan, President
Center for Freedom and Prosperity

Matthew Kandrach, President
Consumer Action for a Strong Economy

Robert Roper, President
Ethan Allen Institute

Jason Pye, Vice President of Legislative Affairs
FreedomWorks

David Barnes, Policy Director
Generation Opportunity

Andresen Blom, Executive Director
Grassroot Hawaii Action

Michael A. Needham, CEO
Heritage Action for America

Mario H. Lopez, President
Hispanic Leadership Fund

Heather R. Higgins, President and CEO
Independent Women's Voice

Andrew Langer, President
Institute for Liberty

Sal J. Nuzzo, Vice President of Policy
The James Madison Institute

Pete Sepp, President
National Taxpayers Union

Karen Kerrigan, President & CEO
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council

David Williams, President
Taxpayers Protection Alliance

Judson Phillips, Founder
Tea Party Nation

Susan W. Gore, Founder
Wyoming Liberty Group

The House will also consider H.R. 3043, which reforms the nations hydro-power policies, and H.R. 2201 which exempts certain small financial firms from state and federal regulations.

The House will also consider a number of bills under suspension of the rules, including:

1. H.R. 2148– modifies capital requirements to enable banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions to more easily make real estate loans. This sounds good except the institutions in questions are federally insured which means they keep the profits while the taxpayers pay for their losses so anything that encourages more loans increases the likelihood of a future taxpayer bailout.

2. H.R. 2123– Allows VA doctors to proactively use telemedicine anywhere in the state they are located.

3. H.R. 2601– allows veterans who do not live within 100 miles of a VA facility to receive transplant surgery at any licensed facility.

Tags: Congress