World's first Genetically Modified babies are born


Dear Readers, As it was in the beginning--man wants to play God. I do not approve of tinkering with our DNA because it is at the very essence of who we are and we have a right to be left alone. Nothing good is going to come out of this. I doubt that these are the first babies, but they are the first that are documented. Blessings, Dona Witmer

World's first GM babies born


    The world's first geneticallymodified humans have been created, it was revealed last night.

    The disclosure that 30 healthy babies were born after a series of experiments in the United States provoked another furious debate about ethics.

    So far, two of the babies have been tested and have been found to contain genes from three 'parents'.

    Fifteen of the children were born in the past three years as a result of one experimental programme at the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of St Barnabas in New Jersey.

    The babies were born to women who had problems conceiving. Extra genes from a female donor were inserted into their eggs before they were fertilised in an attempt to enable them to conceive.

    Genetic fingerprint tests on two one-year- old children confirm that they have inherited DNA from three adults --two women and one man.

    The fact that the children have inherited the extra genes and incorporated them into their 'germline' means that they will, in turn, be able to pass them on to their own offspring.

    Altering the human germline - in effect tinkering with the very make-up of our species - is a technique shunned by the vast majority of the world's scientists.

    Geneticists fear that one day this method could be used to create new races of humans with extra, desired characteristics such as strength or high intelligence.

    Writing in the journal Human Reproduction, the researchers, led by fertility pioneer Professor Jacques Cohen, say that this 'is the first case of human germline genetic modification resulting in normal healthy children'.

    Some experts severely criticised the experiments. Lord Winston, of the Hammersmith Hospital in West London, told the BBC yesterday: 'Regarding the treat-ment of the infertile, there is no evidence that this technique is worth doing . . . I am very surprised that it was even carried out at this stage. It would certainly not be allowed in Britain.'

    John Smeaton, national director of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, said: 'One has tremendous sympathy for couples who suffer infertility problems. But this seems to be a further illustration of the fact that the whole process of in vitro fertilisation as a means of conceiving babies leads to babies being regarded as objects on a production line.

    'It is a further and very worrying step down the wrong road for humanity.' Professor Cohen and his colleagues diagnosed that the women were infertile because they had defects in tiny structures in their egg cells, called mitochondria.

    They took eggs from donors and, using a fine needle, sucked some of the internal material - containing 'healthy' mitochondria - and injected it into eggs from the women wanting to conceive.

    Because mitochondria contain genes, the babies resulting from the treatment have inherited DNA from both women. These genes can now be passed down the germline along the maternal line.

    A spokesman for the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), which regulates 'assisted reproduction' technology in Britain, said that it would not license the technique here because it involved altering the germline.

    Jacques Cohen is regarded as a brilliant but controversial scientist who has pushed the boundaries of assisted reproduction technologies.

    He developed a technique which allows infertile men to have their own children, by injecting sperm DNA straight into the egg in the lab.

    Prior to this, only infertile women were able to conceive using IVF. Last year, Professor Cohen said that his expertise would allow him to clone children --a prospect treated with horror by the mainstream scientific community.

    'It would be an afternoon's work for one of my students,' he said, adding that he had been approached by 'at least three' individuals wishing to create a cloned child, but had turned down their requests.

    Other Posts: Minnesota Supreme Court Blocks Government Plan To Claim Ownership Of DNA: government has been selling the DNA for genetic research purposes & providing to DHS , Minnesota Lawsuit: Newborn Screening Program Keeps Minors' DNA for Testing, Etc. ,  FBI Announces Creation of Biometric Database "Next Generation Identification"--people's bodies will become defacto national identification cards , FDA's New Claim: "Your Body Is a Drug-and We Have the Authority to Regulate It!" , Will US Patent Office end gene patent enslavement of the human race? ,  Fox News: Spanish Researchers Want to Tag Human Embryos With Bar Codes ,  White House: Science of man-made life can proceed--read "tinkering with our DNA" ,  Federal Judge Blocks Federal Funding of Embryonic Stem Cell Research , How to Remake Life: Venter Institute Researchers have made the first viable cell with a synthetic Genome.  ,  Soylent Green? First Human Embryonic Stem Cell Test Begins ,  Bio - Piracy: Gene Giants Stockpile Patents on "Climate-Ready" Crops in Bid to Become Biomasters  ; DNA barcoding aims to protect species, food -- Call it a DNA digital Dewey Decimal System for all life on Earth. , State finds yet another way to jab Americans with needles in pursuit of monolithic DNA database .

    Print Friendly Version of this pagePrint Get a PDF version of this webpagePDF