Tomorrow, the House Judiciary Committee will markup a new version of the USA Freedom Act. Sadly, like last year's version, the new (and not improved) USA Freedom Act will do little or nothing to protect our freedom.
If Congress was serious about reining in the surveillance state, they would markup the Surveillance State Repeal Act (HR 1466), which repeals the so-called "PATRIOT" Act and the 2008 FISA Amendments Act. Any member of Congress looking for ideas on how to protect our liberties can also consult a letter Campaign for Liberty recently cosigned, along with several other groups from across the political spectrum, to the House and Senate Judiciary Committee, calling for the Committee to take real steps to protect our privacy and restore our Constitutional rights.
Text of letter here and below:
April 21, 2015
Dear Chairman Goodlatte, Ranking Member Conyers, Chairman Grassley, and Ranking Member Leahy:
We urge you to end mass surveillance of Americans. Among us are civil liberties organizations from across the political spectrum that speak for millions of people, businesses, whistleblowers, and experts. The impending expiration of three USA PATRIOT Act provisions on June 1 is a golden opportunity to end mass surveillance and enact additional reforms.
Current surveillance practices are virtually limitless. They are unnecessary, counterproductive, and costly. They undermine our economy and the public’s trust in government. And they undercut the proper functioning of government.
Meaningful surveillance reform entails congressional repeal of laws and protocols the Executive secretly interprets to permit current mass surveillance practices. Additionally, it requires Congress to appreciably increase transparency, oversight, and accountability of intelligence agencies, especially those that have acted unconstitutionally.
A majority of the House of Representatives already has voted against mass surveillance. The Massie-Lofgren amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act garnered 293 votes in support of defunding “backdoor searches.” Unfortunately, that amendment was not included in the “CRomnibus” despite overwhelming support. We urge you to act once again to vindicate our fundamental liberties.
End the NSA's bulk collection of telephone information under the USA PATRIOT Act.
Mass surveillance conducted under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act is antithetical to Americans’ exercise of their civil liberties. Section 215 has been interpreted by the Executive branch as providing for the collection of virtually unlimited personal information, from gun records and financial records to our physical locations and with whom we talk. All the worse, this intrusive collection is not only unconstitutional; it is unnecessary. The President's Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board concluded that not a single instance exists "involving a threat to the United States in which the telephone records program made a concrete difference in the outcome of a counterterrorism investigation." Others have reached similar conclusions. Even the NSA considered ending the program because the “the costs outweighed the meager counterterrorism benefits.” Additional provisions that may be interpreted to allow bulk collection—whether under Section 214, via National Security Letters, or elsewhere—must also be addressed.
End the FISA Amendments Act and Executive Order 12333 mass surveillance programs.
Congress must end mass surveillance programs purportedly authorized under the FISA Amendments Act and Executive Order 12333. These programs are incredibly broad. For example, they include the acquisition of vast amounts of information sent privately over the Internet (e.g., "upstream collection" under Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008). They also include any information or communication, by foreigners and Americans, that is ever transmitted outside the physical boundaries of the United States (e.g., as authorized by Executive Order 12333). Section 702 results in the unnecessary collection of innocent Americans’ domestic communications, and EO 12333 raises troubling concerns about the scope of “authorized” collections.
Restore accountability for bad actors in the Intelligence Community.
Accountability starts with truth. Members of Congress, both on the left and the right, must have access to documents necessary to know the full story. They must be able to trust those they oversee. When they are misled, as occurred in statements by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and CIA Director John Brennan, there must be consequences. In addition, the Intelligence committees and members of Congress must have the staff, resources, clearance and cooperation necessary to provide vigorous oversight. A special committee should investigate and publicly report on Intelligence Community transgressions since 9/11.
Mass surveillance is counterproductive.
The evidence shows mass surveillance costs outweigh any tangible benefits. Furthermore, the misdirection of resources undermines support for the analysts who must connect the dots.
Mass surveillance harms our economy.
Mass surveillance will cost the digital economy up to $180 billion in lost revenue by 2016. Law enforcement efforts to subvert the integrity of technology—in particular by attacking privacy and security mechanisms built into technology—threaten the profitability of American manufacturers, entrepreneurs, and software companies. Already, 30% of all American adults report changing their online behavior in response to surveillance fears.
Americans want mass surveillance to stop.
Americans oppose domestic mass surveillance. 57% of American adults deem it unacceptable for government to monitor communications of U.S. citizens, according to a 2015 Pew survey. 61% of Americans are losing confidence that surveillance efforts serve the public interest.
Mass surveillance is a red herring for effective anti-terrorism policies.
America can lead the world in civil liberties. But to do that, we must:
● Ensure a probable cause-based warrant requirement for acquiring and searching the communications of U.S. persons;
● End bulk and “bulky” (i.e., broadly defined, e.g. by location) information collection;
● Inform the public about the scope of surveillance by requiring each intelligence collection agency—and allowing companies—to release granular information about collections;
● Prohibit the government from weakening security and privacy technology;
● Provide pathways for and protect whistleblowers who report problems;
● Slim down the role of the FISC, which has expanded from its original mandate;
● Publish “secret law,” including documents that interpret the law on matters of national security, except to the extent it contains facts that risk the viability of investigations;
● Require independent audits of intelligence agencies' compliance with the law;
● Strengthen and empower Congressional oversight;
● Legislatively address and limit the state secrets privilege; and
● Conduct a full accounting of post-9/11 intelligence community activities with substantial public reporting.
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC)
Arab American Institute
Badger Maps, Inc.
Bill of Rights Defense Committee
Defending Dissent Foundation
Fight for the Future
Freedom of the Press Foundation
Friends Committee on National Legislation
Government Accountability Project
J. Kirk Weibe
John Tate, President, Campaign for Liberty
Law Office of Elaine Mittleman
National Security Counselors
Participatory Politics Foundation
Project On Government Oversight (POGO)
R Street Institute
Restore The Fourth
Rhode Island Coalition to Defend Human and Civil Rights
Student Net Alliance
See “This Meaningful Surveillance Reform Had Bipartisan Support. It Failed Anyway,” Slate (Dec 10, 2014), available at http://goo.gl/aKNE5K.
See “NSA Reform That Passed House Reportedly Cut From ‘Cromnibus’: A landslide vote to end 'backdoor' surveillance appears to have been scuttled by backroom deal,” US News and World Report (Dec. 4, 2014), available at http://goo.gl/3TVHbd.
See “NRA joins ACLU lawsuit, claims NSA starting 'gun registry,'” The Hill (Sep. 14, 2013), available at http://goo.gl/kEm7GX.
See “C.I.A. Collects Global Data on Transfers of Money,” New York Times (Nov. 14, 2013), available at http://goo.gl/c639zp.
See “In Test Project, N.S.A. Tracked Cellphone Locations,” New York Times (Oct. 2, 2013), available at http://goo.gl/VF09cJ.
“Independent review board says NSA phone data program is illegal and should end,” Washington Post (Jan. 23, 2014), available at http://goo.gl/3vU14C.
See, e.g., “Liberty and Security in a Changing World,” Report and Recommendations of the President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies (Dec. 12, 2013), available at http://goo.gl/57RCgm.
“NSA weighed ending phone program before leak,” Washington Post (Mar. 30, 2015), available at http://goo.gl/TdBx1Q.
“In NSA-intercepted data, those not targeted far outnumber the foreigners who are,” Washington Post (July 5, 2014), available at http://goo.gl/WGj8hF.
See ‘Meet Executive Order 12333: The Reagan rule that lets the NSA spy on Americans,” Washington Post (July 18, 2014), available at http://goo.gl/kpq6Cu.
See Memorandum Opinion, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, available at http://goo.gl/uF0Lmj.
See “Florida congressman denied access to censored pages from 9/11 report, Miami Herald (Dec. 29, 2014), available at http://goo.gl/dohTCW; “Members of Congress denied access to basic information about NSA,” The Guardian (Aug. 4, 2013), available at http://goo.gl/kCxh4o.
See “Making Alberto Gonzales look good,” New York Times (June 11, 2013), available at http://goo.gl/IOgoWo; “It’s about the lying,” The Intercept (July 31, 2014), available at http://goo.gl/N7JqJC.
See “Congressional Oversight of National Security Reform Agenda” (Dec. 17, 2014), available at http://goo.gl/d2hzYQ.
See, e.g., “The Whole Haystack,” The New Yorker (Jan 26, 2015), available at http://goo.gl/GQ6BC1.
“NSA’s PRISM could cost IT service market $180 billion,” Wall Street Journal (Aug. 16, 2013), available at http://goo.gl/wRmRX7.
“FBI Director Comey calls on Congress to stop unlockable encryption,” Washington Post (Oct. 17, 2014), available at http://goo.gl/ayQa9e.
“Americans’ privacy strategies post-Snowden,” Pew Research Center (Mar. 16, 2015), available at http://goo.gl/JDj6Rs.
See supra “Americans’ privacy strategies post-Snowden.”
Tags: Patriot Act, USA Freedom Act, FISA Amendments Act